You are here

Nonpartisan Redistricting Panel Reveals Unofficial NC Congressional Voting Map

August 29, 2016

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, Aug. 29, 2016

Contacts: Karen Kemp, Duke Sanford School of Public Policy
(919) 613-7394
Karen.Kemp@duke.edu,
or
Bryan Warner, Common Cause NC
(919) 836-0027
bwarner@commoncause.org,

RALEIGH, N.C. -- A nonpartisan panel of retired North Carolina justices and judges on Monday unveiled a new, but unofficial, congressional map for North Carolina to demonstrate how independent redistricting can work in the state.

The new congressional map is the culmination of a four-month-long redistricting simulation launched as a joint project between Duke University and Common Cause North Carolina. Comprised of an equal number of Republicans and Democrats, the panel of 10 retired judges was led by former N.C. Supreme Court Chief Justices Rhoda Billings and Henry Frye.

A panel's proposed congressional map for NCA panel's proposed congressional map for North Carolina (at right and below).

The bipartisan panel created 13 geographically compact districts without considering political party registration or voting history. The jurists drew districts with equal populations, while complying with the federal Voting Rights Act.

"Although we have different political backgrounds, we put that aside to draw districts in a fair and impartial way," said Frye, a Democrat.

Highlight for Basic Page

  • Sample Map

    Here is the sample congressional map drawn up by the panel. The new map demonstrates how independent redistricting can work in North Carolina. A larger version of the map is below.

     

    The WRAL editorial board wrote the following about the project:

    Thanks to Duke University, Common Cause North Carolina eight outstanding jurists for showing us a workable first step toward fair elections. Our legislators now need to embrace their work to provide a plan for representative government that doesn’t guarantee partisan dominance but rather makes equal representation and voter participation the top priority.
     

    Read the full editorial here.

Billings, a Republican, said, “The members of the panel took very seriously the mission -- to create congressional districts without considering politics. In the process we found that it is not possible to adhere to laws and court decisions applicable to redistricting without crossing county lines.”

While the panel of former judges did not look at any political data, the result is a more competitive set of districts than the existing congressional map created by the North Carolina General Assembly. An analysis of the judges' map shows six likely Republican districts, four likely Democratic districts and three toss-up districts. That compares to 10 likely Republican districts, three likely Democratic districts and no toss-up districts under the congressional map drawn by state lawmakers earlier this year.

Tom Ross, former UNC system president and the Terry Sanford Distinguished Fellow at the Sanford School of Public Policy, initiated the project and advised the panel of judges during the redistricting simulation.

"The panel did an outstanding job of following the clear criteria of achieving equal population, compactness and compliance with the Voting Rights Act, while leaving out partisan political consideration," Ross said.

"We believe this exercise shows how impartial redistricting can produce voting maps that are free from partisan gerrymandering and accurately reflect the population of North Carolina."

The legislature is responsible for drawing North Carolina’s federal congressional and state legislative districts. However, the process has frequently led to controversy, with more than 30 court interventions in the state’s redistricting process over the past three decades.

Earlier this year, a federal court ruled the legislature had unconstitutionally gerrymandered two of the state's 13 congressional districts along racial lines. That ruling forced the N.C. General Assembly to redraw the districts and delayed the state's congressional primaries from March to June.

The current system produces consistently safe congressional districts, Ross said, in which elected representatives are less accountable to voters. The result is polarization, gridlock and “loss of belief in our democracy,” Ross said.

Bob Phillips, executive director of the nonpartisan nonprofit organization Common Cause NC, said there is increasing support for independent redistricting in North Carolina.

"We are seeing growing agreement among voters and political leaders from both sides of the political aisle that we need to take partisanship out of the way voting maps are drawn in North Carolina," Phillips said. "The work done by these former judges shows how a truly impartial redistricting process could be successfully adopted in North Carolina."

Phillips noted that both Republican Gov. Pat McCrory and Democratic Attorney General Roy Cooper are on record opposing gerrymandering, as are former governors Jim Hunt, a Democrat, and Jim Martin, a Republican. In April, a Public Policy Polling survey found nearly 60 percent of North Carolina voters would favor an independent system of redistricting. Just 9 percent opposed such a move.


A comparison of the proposed map and the map enacted in 2016.

Listen to the press conference here:

 

 

                                      _        _        _        _

Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy is one of the nation’s leading schools of public policy. It offers undergraduate, master’s and doctoral degrees in public policy and international development policy. Former North Carolina Gov. Terry Sanford, then president of Duke, established the school in 1972.

Common Cause North Carolina is a nonpartisan and nonprofit organization dedicated to encouraging citizen participation in democracy, and is part of the national Common Cause grassroots network of 400,000 members in 35 states.

###